logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.24 2015고단2409 (2)
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The seized one of the 26 pages (No. 1) and one of the Red Seas (No. 2).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is equipped with five smuggling and one shower room, etc. in Suwon-gu B and 2, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and one other. The Defendant is a person who operates “C”, and D is an employee of the said establishment.

On March 21, 2015, the Defendant employed D as the above business establishment; D, upon receiving KRW 100,000 in cash from the police officer who pretended to be customers in return for sexual intercourse at the above business establishment around April 21, 2015, and moved D, which is a sexual traffic woman, into the above smuggling, was brought into the above smuggling; and arranged sexual traffic in collusion with D from April 14, 2015 to April 21, 2015; and continuously, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic by the said method as seen above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant and D;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of each police officer against the defendant or D;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each statement prepared by the F;

1. Police seizure records;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and selection of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [Referral, etc. for sexual traffic] 2 types (including brokerage, etc. for commercial sex acts by business and giving and receiving consideration, etc.) are as follows: (a) the Defendant was punished by a fine of three million won on December 2008 and a fine of three million won on September 201; (b) on September 2014, the Defendant again committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution, even though he/she was punished by a fine of three million won on October 201; and (c) on October 2, 2014, the instant crime was committed during the period of suspension of execution.

The crime of this case was originally controlled on April 21, 2015 and was charged on June 8, 2015 with respect to the crime until then. However, even during the trial, the Defendant continued to commit the crime at the same place on August 19, 2015, which is the date of the second trial.

arrow