1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On June 1, 2010, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion was leased to the Defendant by setting the interest rate of KRW 30 million per annum and by December 31, 2010, and by the due date for repayment. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the said loan, interest thereon, and delay damages to the Plaintiff.

2. According to the judgment of the court below, Gap evidence No. 3, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff remitted 30 million won to the defendant on June 1, 2010.

However, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the argument in Eul evidence No. 7, the defendant's remittance amount to the defendant from July 24, 2007 to August 23, 2010, including the above KRW 33,50 million, and the defendant's remittance amount to the plaintiff constitutes a total of KRW 67,276,00,000, and the defendant's remittance amount to the plaintiff constitutes a total of KRW 67,276,00,00, and in particular, the defendant transferred the money to the plaintiff on February 26, 2010. In addition, considering such circumstances as the fact that the defendant did not prepare the above 30,000,000,000,000 won as the loan, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the plaintiff's assertion was a loan of KRW 30,000,00,000,000,000.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.