The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On February 18, 2017, at the “D” restaurant operated by the Defendant in Jeju-si, Jeju-si, the summary of the facts charged, the Defendant: (a) stated that the victim E (16 years of age, female, and household name) who is a part-time employee of the Defendant’s operation of the Defendant at Jeju-si (hereinafter “D”); (b) stated that the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

2. Determination:

A. The summary of the Defendant’s assertion does not constitute an act identical to that stated in the facts charged.

(b) Whether the defendant committed an act identical to that stated in the facts charged as a result of the jury verdict - Three persons: Four persons;

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in the instant case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered after the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment is publicly announced pursuant to Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition after the public participation trial at the request of the defendant for more than one reason.