Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a cargo vehicle of 11.5 tons in Category B.

On November 20, 2014, the Defendant driving the above cargo vehicle around 16:20 on November 20, 2014, and led directly to the direction of Chuncheon from the front of the “D” road in Chuncheon City.

However, since the place is where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the car with the driver's duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to operate the central line, and received the top part of the Frocco drive E (the age of 64) of the victim E (the age of 64) as the front part of the cargo vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as external blood transfusion, which has two open situations where approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment is needed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate (as of December 18, 2014)

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation Form] 1 of the General Traffic Accident Act (the injury of traffic accidents) is aggravated (the person subject to special mitigation) (the person subject to special mitigation) / Cases where there is no penalty (including serious effort to recover damage) / serious injury (the first type), and the case where illegality in the proviso of Article 3(2) of the School Special Act is serious (the decision of the sentence] / Where the defendant driving a truck of 1.5 tons and did not sufficiently secure the view at the site of the accident, but the defendant 1.5 tons of the truck and did not have sufficient time at the site of the accident. However, the driver's vehicle of the victim who was frighted in the opposite direction while overtaking the central line of the previous vehicle, and the victim was seriously injured by the victim.