logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.06.16 2015고정1666
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 19:50 on August 15, 2015, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., around 19:50, 2015, performed drinking, such as the victim D (the remaining, 44 years of age). The Defendant reported the Defendant’s desire to her wife, and the victim changed the victim’s her wife’s “Is the frith, so that Is the frith,” “Is that I do not interfere with the other’s house,” “Is the victim’s face one time, flick, and flicked with a wall.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the body of each suspect;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that the victim did not suffer injury. However, according to the above photographs (Evidence Nos. 8, 9 pages), the victim's flive body is redly flicked on the part of the victim's flive body, the victim's flive body contains a hole, the victim's flive body contains several flives on the part of the head, the victim's flive statement showed that the victim's flives occurred on the head flive body, and the victim's flives continued to 4 to 7 days, although the victim's flive body did not receive treatment or a written diagnosis of injury at the hospital, it can be acknowledged that the victim suffered two flives on the part of the victim's flive body, and it appears that the victim was

2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that even if the defendant's assault against the victim was committed, it constitutes an act to defend the victim's unfair conduct of harm, and thus, it constitutes a legitimate defense, and thus, illegality should be avoided.

arrow