A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

[2] On March 6, 1978, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of one year, one year, and eight months, and one year and six months, and one year and six months of imprisonment for special larceny at the Seoul Central District Court on March 5, 1980; on August 11, 1981, the Seoul High Court was sentenced to a maximum of two years and six months of imprisonment for special larceny; on May 28, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of one million won or more as an attempted larceny at the Seoul Central District Court; on January 31, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of three million won or more as a fine at the Seoul Central District Court; on April 27, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court on March 23, 201, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one million won or more as a fine at the Seoul District Court on March 21, 2011.

[2] On August 10, 2015, around 18:13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) habitually boarded the victim’s scam on the scam scam sponsed by the fest sponsed by the fright line of the feston line located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, which is located in the Hagueroro 340; (b) habitually knife the knife on the back side of the victim’s left side; and (c) knife the x ffest 2 smartphone sponsed by the victim’s market price on the back of the 700,000 won.

As a result, the theft was committed.

In addition, from that time to September 14, 2015, the Defendant stolen the victims' property habitually over four times in total, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A written statement prepared by the F and G;

1. Each investigation report and internal investigation report (the list of evidence Nos. 2, 4, 9, 11, 12, 14);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Investigative inquiries about criminal history, investigation reports (verification of the previous convictions in the same offense, date of completion of execution, etc.);

1. Habituality of judgment: Recognition of dampness in light of the records of each crime in the judgment, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crime has been committed in a planned manner.