1. The defendant

(a) deliver each parcel of land listed in [Attachment 1] and 2 among the real estate listed in the annexed list;

B. 6,839.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 7, 1996, the Plaintiff purchased each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) from C on March 7, 1996 and completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt No. 16719 on March 19, 196 by the Ulsan District Court.

B. The first land was changed from March 9, 2012 to the road on May 17, 1996, and the second land was changed to the road on May 17, 1996, and the Defendant had previously carried out the asphalt package on the first and second land. The neighboring village residents passed the land attached to the mountain, used it as a road for the purpose of forming a farm house on the side of the village, the passage to a livestock farm or wood plant on the side of the village, the passage to a wood farm or wood plant on the side of the village, and the passage of spawers for mountain-speed seedlings.

C. On October 15, 1996, D factory site 3,635 square meters in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun is divided into 3,530 square meters for D factory site, 82 square meters for E factory site (hereinafter “three-dimensional land before land category change”), and 23 square meters for F factory site (hereinafter “4-land before land category change”). Of these, the Defendant completed the registration procedure for transfer of ownership in his name on the ground of consultation on December 1, 1997 with respect to 3,4 land before land category change on December 5, 1997. On the other hand, on January 16, 2004, the land category was changed from the factory site to the embankment respectively.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy Facts, Gap-6 evidence, Eul-13 evidence (including those with a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) or images, the result of the on-site inspection by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Parts of land 1 and 2;

A. According to the above facts in determining the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to deliver the land Nos. 1 and 2 to the plaintiff who is the owner of the land and to pay the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent, since the defendant occupies the land Nos. 1 and 2 in the asphalt.

나. 피고의 주장에 관한 판단 1 피고가 점유하지 않는다는 주장 ㈎ 피고는, 제1, 2토지는 피고가 점유하는 것이 아니라 그 인근...