The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) around February 8, 2011, the Defendants obtained the right of the victim to establish a whole-scale branch office and learning center from the Plaintiff, Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) (hereinafter “E”); (b) upon entering into a contract with D, the Defendants would have the right to establish a branch office through a contract with G; and (c) would have received KRW 10 million from the victims as the security deposit for the establishment of the branch office; and (d) the Defendants and E received KRW 10,000 from the victims in a false manner. In full view of the fact that the Defendants had no intent or ability to pay the purchase price of non-listed stocks from E, and the Defendants obtained the right of the victims to purchase and sell the stocks to the victims, and thus, the Defendants did not have the right to receive more than KRW 10,000,000 from the Daegu District Court.

2. The Defendants of the facts charged in the instant case are those who operate D with the couple, and D are companies that open a branch office selling the right to attend a lecture in E, or recruit companies that are able to attend online lectures provided in E.

On February 8, 2011, the Defendants obtained the authority to establish the Korean General Sales Office, the branch office, and the learning center from the victim F to the victim F.E.

When a branch is established, many.