A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C Smart Motor Vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egressing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Egres from Accidents).

On April 16, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.065% in blood around 07:56 on April 16, 2016, and led to the running of the said car at a speed of approximately 20km per hour in the direction of the private school pension center, along with three lanes from the four-lane distance of sampling head to the four-lane distance.

At this point, there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the steering system and the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was under the influence of alcohol prior to being in progress due to the negligence of being driven by the Defendant, and was driven by the victim D(61 S) who was under the influence of stopping, following the E rocketing car, and received the part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the passenger car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt pans, tensions, etc., requiring treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the victim to use repair costs of KRW 524,428, such as the exchange of a rocketing car, after the said victim’s operation.

2. On April 16, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, as indicated in paragraph (1) around 07:56, and went away from the site, and continued to run in violation of the signal, despite the fact that the Defendant was a stop signal at a four-distance as a dry field of Daejeon Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and continued to run in violation of the signal, despite the fact that the Defendant was a stop signal on the roads in front of the forew of the forew of the day, the Defendant violated the signal and proceeded with the pedestrian facing the crosswalk, and the same Gu.