Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

around 14:30 on May 15, 2013, the Defendant appeared and testified as a witness of the loan claim case between the Plaintiff C and Defendant D at the Seoul Northern District Court No. 306, Seoul Northern District Court No. 2012Na8756, the above court’s 2012Na8756, which was the Seoul Northern District Court

The Defendant testified to Defendant D’s testimony that “The witness paid the appointment fee to the attorney F office at his own risk” in the question of “Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2008Kahap1347, creditor D and two others, debtor E and three others, and the provisional disposition of suspending the performance of duties.”

However, on November 2008, at the monthly elementary school in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, G, H, and I collected and collected attorney fees, the defendant was also at the site, and the defendant also participated in the fund-raising and paid 400,000 won to the defendant, and there was a fact that the J delivered one million won of paid fees to the attorney fees, so it was well known that he paid the attorney fees in the case of provisional disposition for suspension of duties.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. The statements made by witnesses D, G and J in the third protocol of trial;

1. Each prosecutor's statement to G and J;

1. Protocol of examination of witness;

1. Investigation report (to make telephone conversations with the J of Witnesses);

1. Application of one copy of a bankbook at G post offices;

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;