All judgment of the court below shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Of the facts charged of this case, H on 207.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to the judgment of the first instance court, Defendant 1 was able to newly construct a telecom on the ground of the Jancheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, and secure funds as a collateral and fully repay the security deposit, price for supply, and cost for construction, etc., of the victims. However, since the new construction of the above building did not secure the funds by force from G after the new construction of the building, the Defendant was found to have the ability to repay and intent to repay at the time of the conclusion of each contract as stated in the facts charged of the instant case, the first instance court found Defendant guilty of each charges

B) In regard to the judgment of the third court, the defendant did not deceiving the above victim as stated in this part of the facts charged, and merely did not transfer the remaining shares on the wind bound by the criminal facts acknowledged in the judgment of the first instance court after being transferred 45% of the above shares, but the third court's conviction of this part of the facts charged is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment. 2) The sentence (the first judgment of the second court of the second instance: imprisonment with prison labor of 5 years, 4 months, and 10 months: imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months) imposed by each of the judgment of the court below of unfair sentencing is unreasonable.

(b)the above sentence sentenced by the Prosecutor 3rd instance (10 months of imprisonment) is too unhued and unreasonable;

2. Determination

A. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant and prosecutor ex officio, the case of appeal by this court 2013No1754, which is the appellate case against the judgment of the court of first instance, and the case of appeal against the judgment of the court of second instance 2013No1763, which is the appellate case against the judgment of the court of second instance and the judgment of the court of third instance 2013No3145, which is the appellate case against the judgment of the court of second instance, were each consolidated in the oral proceedings of the court of first instance. Each of the offenses of the court below 1 through 3 against