logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.08.07 2018가단1423
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relevant Plaintiff is the father of the deceased C (D students, death on February 3, 2017, hereinafter “the deceased”), and the deceased, as a class 1 disabled person, was living in E, a protection facility for the disabled operated by the Defendant from around 2008 (hereinafter “Defendant Facilities”).

B. At around 11:31 on January 29, 2017, the Deceased, as a Sundays, left the second floor lecture, which was a towing place, at his own discretion, and at around 11:31 on the same day, he discovered the deceased who was used in the corridor of the Defendant’s facility, and was individually stored in the first floor of the restaurant kitchen, which was brought by F, the main kitchen of the Defendant’s facility, at the house, brought about from the house, and was stored in the first floor of the restaurant kitchen, and was dried up in the 11:38th floor of the same day, after eating the restaurant. (2) A teacher of the Defendant’s G facility discovered the deceased, who was used in the corridor of the first floor around 11:44 on the same day, and reported immediately.

3) At around 12:24, around 119 first-aid vehicles, the Deceased transferred to the H Hospital emergency room on the same day, but no consciousness was returned thereto. After that, the Deceased transferred to the Jvalescent Hospital located in I in Ysan-si, and died of low carbon cerebral cerebral cerebral Bribery caused by qualitative corrosion around 17:30 on February 3, 2017. [In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, evidence A(1) through 6, evidence A(11), evidence A(12), and evidence A(1) and 2(1) and the purport of the entire pleadings, images, and the entire arguments.

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion was negligent in protecting and supervising the Deceased as a good manager upon entrustment by the Plaintiff, and neglected to ensure that the Deceased take drinking rice, etc. in the first floor restaurant in the Defendant’s facility, and caused the death of the Deceased by negligence, which did not promptly take emergency measures against the Deceased who was frighting to drink rice.

Therefore, the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the amount stated in the claim as consolation money.

B. Determination 1.

arrow