logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.10.19 2017구합67506
전학 등 처분 취소청구의 소
Text

1. On April 24, 2017, the Defendant issued a transfer to the Plaintiffs, five days of special education, and five hours of special education for parents.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. G, H, and the Plaintiffs were students who were enrolled in the first grade of the Seoul F High School (hereinafter “victims”) and those who were enrolled in G, H, and the first grade of the Seoul F High School (G voluntarily withdrawn from the school after being expelled from the school of this case, and the victimized students were transferred to another school after the instant case), G and H were in the first grade 9, the first grade 9, the second grade in the Plaintiff C, the first grade 5, and the second grade in the Plaintiff C, and the damaged students were in the first grade 10.

B. On April 17, 2017, the Fhigh School Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “instant autonomous committee”) held a meeting on April 17, 2017 and called “G from April 10, 2017 to 02:0, G, H, the Plaintiffs, and the victimized students are not in compliance with the student status, and at the time of the instant case, G sent a week 4 disease to the J so as to avoid falling short of the student status. G went back to the damaged students and forced sexual assault again. H and the Plaintiffs were able to take such measures at the time of the instant case.

On the ground of “School Violence Prevention and Countermeasures Act” (hereinafter “School Violence Prevention Act”) Article 17(1)9 of the School Violence Prevention and Countermeasures Act and Article 17(1)6 of the same Act, five days of expulsion from school under Article 17(1)8 of the School Violence Prevention Act and suspension of attendance from H and the plaintiffs, and five hours of transfer from school under Article 17(1)8 of the same Act, five days of special education, and five hours of special education from parents under Article 17(3) of the same Act. The defendant decided on April 24, 2017 against G, H, and the plaintiffs (hereinafter among them, “each of the dispositions of this case”) and notified each guardian thereof. C. The plaintiffs appealed against each of the dispositions of this case and filed a request for reexamination with the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Student Disciplinary Mediation Committee on May 8, 2017, but the above commission did not determine that the school violence in this case constitutes a serious school violence as a result of the said decision.

arrow