1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except where the plaintiff added the following judgments as to the matters alleged in the court of first instance different from that of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main text of Article 420

2. The Plaintiff appears to have lent KRW 1,00,00,000 on December 28, 2016, and KRW 1,000,00 on January 20, 2017, and KRW 1,000,00 on April 3, 2017 to the Defendant on April 3, 2017 after withdrawing from each Plaintiff’s passbook, and then lent KRW 3,00,000,000 on May 19, 2017 to the Defendant. However, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant loaned KRW 2,00,000 on May 19, 2017 to the Defendant each of the above KRW 14,00 on June 14, 200, and then lent KRW 00 to the Defendant on June 30, 2015.

Then, I argue that ‘the matter' is.

According to the statement No. 1-1 of the plaintiff's passbook No. 1-2, each of the above amounts was withdrawn from the plaintiff's passbook on each of the above dates. However, the above facts alone are insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff delivered each of the above amounts to the defendant on each of the above dates and lent them. In addition, even if the plaintiff neglected the plaintiff's evidence No. 4-1 to No. 4, which was submitted by this court as evidence to acknowledge the facts of lending, it is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's above facts of assertion, and there is no other evidence to

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.