logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.09.02 2015가단24296
가등기말소
Text

1. The defendant on June 1, 1989, with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiff, the Jeonju District Court, Jinan District Court, Jinan District Court.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant completed the provisional registration of the right to claim transfer of ownership on June 1, 1989, No. 6421, which was received on June 1, 1989, with respect to each of the real estates listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estates”) in the [Attachment List Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the provisional registration of this case”).

B. However, the Defendant did not exercise the right to complete the pre-sale agreement on the provisional registration of this case until now.

C. The deceased C died on January 5, 1992, and his heir D and children, E, F and the Plaintiff.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above findings of the determination, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant’s right to complete the pre-sale of the instant provisional registration was extinguished due to the lapse of the exclusion period due to the failure to exercise the right to complete the pre-sale of the instant provisional registration for at least ten years.

As such, the defendant, as one of the successors of each real estate of this case, is obligated to implement the procedure for cancellation registration of provisional registration of this case to the plaintiff seeking cancellation of provisional registration of this case as part of preservation act.

I would like to say.

As to this, the Defendant asserted to the effect that Nonparty G was unable to exercise the right to complete the purchase and sale reservation since Nonparty G was unable to exercise the right to complete the purchase and sale reservation. Accordingly, according to the above evidence, it can be recognized that Nonparty G applied for provisional registration of this case to prohibit the sale, transfer, or any other disposal on June 3, 1997 and applied for provisional disposition prohibiting the sale, transfer, or any other disposal on the provisional registration of this case by the former District Court 97Kadan3745. However, the above provisional disposition was merely prohibited by the Defendant from selling, selling, transferring, or disposing of the provisional registration of this case, and there is such disposition prohibiting the above disposal.

arrow