logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.05.14 2019고단972
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

The sentence of A shall be one year of imprisonment and six months of imprisonment for defendant B.

For two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On April 12, 2019, the Jeonju District Court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a year of imprisonment due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., and the judgment was finalized on the 20th of the same month.

Defendant

A operated a sexual traffic business establishment with Da, EF, G H heading, G H heading, Red Sea, Corching, Twel, and female diesel, etc., Jeonju-si, and Defendant B played a role in managing sexual traffic business establishments.

From the beginning of November 2018 to February 21, 2019, the Defendants received 120,000 won from many unspecified men who found sexual traffic in a sexual traffic business establishment from 1.21:20,000 won from 1.20,00 won to 1.50,000 won, and directed them to “C building” No. d, etc., and had sexual traffic women, including I, do sexual intercourse with men.

The Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging commercial sex acts for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect with regard to I;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Investigation report (related to attaching details of cellphone calls, etc.);

1. A report on investigation (calculated additional charges);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as suspect A and B (compactivity), the same kind of power;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) (B) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);

1. The punishment of an additional charge of arranging sexual traffic is recognized. Article 25 (Defendant A) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

Considering the scale and duration of commercial sex acts establishments, Defendant A takes into account the size of business establishments, and Defendant B takes into account the circumstances of ex post concurrent crimes, such as crimes of the same kind.

arrow