logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.11.21 2014나5441 (1)
소유권보존등기말소
Text

1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and all of the plaintiff's claims corresponding to the revocation part shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasons why this Court has used this part of the basic facts are as follows: "No. 5 Eul is written in Eul evidence 5, 6, Eul evidence 9, Eul evidence 26 to 42 (including the number of pages if the number of pages is not indicated separately; hereinafter the same shall apply)" in the second part of the third part of the judgment of the court of the first instance; "G (1503 to 1560) is jointly set up in the third part of the judgment of the first instance, "G (1503 to 1560)" in the second part of the second part of the judgment of the court of the first instance shall be deemed as "A (1543 to 1591)" and "the forest of this case" in the third part of the judgment of the first instance shall be deemed as "the forest of this case" in the second part of the judgment of the first instance and the second part of the judgment shall be deemed as "the forest of this case" in the second part of the judgment of the second instance and the second part of the judgment shall be deemed as "the forest of this case" (hereinafter).

2. Summary of the assertion

A. The reasons why the Plaintiff’s use of this part is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance (from No. 6 to No. 75 of the judgment of the first instance). Therefore, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. Defendant clan 1) The forest land of this case was owned and managed by Defendant clan since the 1560s under the name of P, and the registration of preservation of ownership was completed in the state that each forest land of this case divided in each forest of this case was not unregistered in around 1977. Accordingly, the registration of preservation of the dispute of this case conforms to the substantive legal relationship. Defendant clan occupied each forest of this case since the 16th century, and at least from around June 15, 1918 when it was circumstances in the name of P, at least from around July 15, 1918 when Defendant clan was in the name of P, or from around July 1953 when CY was in the first president, Defendant clan occupied and managed each forest of this case from November 10, 1961 when Defendant clan registered each forest of this case as it had been registered as the above land in Sejong.

arrow