logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.10.24 2017고단142
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant received money from the husband C, which is a food material distributor, and operated, from the husband C, kept each official certificate of E and F, which is his parent, due to the difficulties in the financial situation, and received money from the lending company in the above E and F’s name and received money from the lending company to use it as business funds.

1. On March 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) called “D” office located at the window G of Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) called “D”; (c) called “D” office for social loan to the victim Co., Ltd., Ltd.; and (d) applied for a loan of KRW 3 million to an unqualified person, who is an employee of the victim company, as he/she himself/herself.

However, the Defendant did not obtain consent from F on the receipt of a loan in the name of F as above.

As above, the defendant deceivings the employee in charge of the victim company to transfer 3 million won to the national bank account in the name of F for the same day from the victim company.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On March 19, 2015, the Defendant filed an application for a loan of KRW 3,00,000,000,000 with the Defendant, who was an employee of the victim company, by calls to the Defendant, at the date, place, and at the time, place specified in paragraph 1, and by calls to the Defendant, the victim’s original capital loan company.

However, the Defendant did not obtain consent from F on the receipt of a loan in the name of F as above.

As above, the defendant deceivings the employee in charge of the victim company to transfer 3 million won to the national bank account in the name of F for the same day from the victim company.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

3. On August 27, 2015, the Defendant was an employee in charge of the victim’s HK Savings Bank by phoneing the victim HK Savings Bank to the said “D” office.

arrow