logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.07 2015고단3929
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2015 Godan3929" [criminal power] on July 11, 2014, was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court on July 19, 2014, which became final and conclusive on July 19, 2014, and is currently under probation.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On June 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) started from the Western coal station around 21:30 on June 1, 2015; and (b) came from the subway line from the subway station that entered the stone station to the stone station; and (c) was stolen by having a cell phone with a cell phone with the victim’s identity with which the victim’s market price on his/her hand cannot be identified, by approaching the victim, whose name the seat seat of the electric vehicle is seated is unknown; and

2. On June 25, 2015, at around 22:20, the Defendant: (a) approached the victim F, who was in the seat of the former dynamic vehicle under the influence of alcohol, by approaching the victim F, who was in the hands of the victim’s gallon in Samsung Gallon, the market price of the victim’s 700,000 won in Samsung Gallon, which is the victim’s gallon, operated as a session station from the luminous 22:20,01.

3. On June 25, 2015, at around 22:40, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with one cell phone in Samsung Galtha, the market price of the victim’s possession of Samsung Galth, the victim of which the victim was able to sit at the seat of the electric vehicle under the influence of alcohol to the front line; and (b) was 80,000,000 won of the market price of Samsung Galtha, which was set up by the Defendant.

around 00:42 on June 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by taking advantage of the gap in which the victim’s name is under the influence of alcohol and there is no person around it; (b) using the gap in which the victim’s market price located far away from the floor is unknown; (c) using the cre in which the victim’s name could not be identified; and (d) using the cre in which the victim’s market price located far from the floor was cut off.

The defendant and defense counsel asserted that the thief was only attempted.

However, according to the evidence examined below, the defendant collected the bank of the victim who was in the front train at the time and moved the place.

arrow