logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.21 2018고단1008
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On October 16, 2001, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul District Court (Seoul District Court) and was released on July 30, 2003 at a female prison on which the sentence was executed, and the parole period expired on November 1, 2003.

[2018 Highest 1008] When a defendant was investigated into a crime of fraud, he/she was released from the Republic of Korea on May 6, 2006 and residing in a foreign country, and was released on February 7, 2018 from the wind discovered while he/she was trying to depart from the Republic of Korea by using a forged passport.

1. Fraud against the victim B;

A. On November 4, 2003, the Defendant was guilty of fraud, and around November 4, 2003, the Defendant was unable to reach the phone call from the victim in the Philippines to conclude the work “at least before moving the carbed.”

On three (3) days after the loan of money, the Plaintiff returned to the Republic of Korea without delay and borrowed the money for repayment.”

However, even if the defendant did not have any particular property and borrowed money from the victim because of the lack of debt, he did not have any intention or ability to repay the money to the victim after the three days.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 13.45 million from the victim to the D bank account in the name of C, and received KRW 18.45 million in total from the D bank account in the name of E, and transferred KRW 18.45 million in total to the D bank account in the name of E.

B. Around November 7, 2003, the Defendant, on November 7, 2003, posted a phone to the victim in the Philippines, and, on November 7, 2003, sold money to the local bond company of the Philippines, the Defendant was deprived of all while gambling at the casino, thereby making up for money to the local bond company of the Philippines. However, the Defendant detained the bond company in the hotel.

He/she shall return home with money to the Republic of Korea and make a full repayment.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendant did not have been detained by the bond company, and was thought to use the money for the purpose of casino gambling by lending money from the victim, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant.

arrow