logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.11.09 2018고단637
물환경보전법위반
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of B Co., Ltd. located in Dong Young-si, and Defendant B Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling ready-mixed.

1. Defendant A business operator or any person who operates prevention facilities shall not discharge water pollutants from discharge facilities without flowing them into prevention facilities, or install facilities capable of discharging water pollutants without flowing them into prevention facilities;

The Defendant, from around 10:00 to 14:30 on March 23, 2018, in operating wastewater discharge facilities after filing a report on the installation of wastewater discharge facilities at the place of business of the said joint stock company B from around 10:00 to around 14:30, while running the business, and, at the same time, in the concentration of hydrogen ion concentration generated from cement mortar and manufacturing facilities for the products thereof,

5. 8-8.6) The wastewater containing alknife water pollutants was discharged without permission without discharging 810L into preventive facilities.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. (Representative Director: A), the representative of the Defendant, committed the act of violation as described in paragraph 1 in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A certificate of an offense;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the offender's report on the commencement of internal investigation, certificate of report on fugitive dust-generating business, certificate of report on the installation of wastewater discharging facilities, field photographs of the violation, investigation report (written request for an extension of report on the installation of

1. Defendant A: Article 76 subparag. 3 of the Water Environment Conservation Act and Article 38(1) subparag. 1 of the Water Environment Conservation Act: Defendant B corporation: Articles 81, 76 subparag. 3, and 38(1)1 of the Water Environment Conservation Act;

1. Defendants who choose to impose punishment: Each selective fine

1. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Taking into account the following: Defendant A’s reason for sentencing Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the instant mistake; and paid an administrative fine of 12 million won due to an administrative disposition:

arrow