The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the Defendants to the punishment (a fine of five million won per fine) is too uneasible.

2. The crime of this case was committed in collusion with Co-defendant A of the lower court on June 4, 2014 by disclosing the fact that the Defendants conspired with Co-Defendant A that was unfavorable to S, a preliminary candidate for the 6th regional election of Dong-si, which was implemented on June 4, 2014, and at the same time, defames Q, by pointing out false facts against S including S, the issuer of the I regional competitive newspaper company, the compilation bureau, and the relevant facts. The crime is not good, and its dissemination is deemed to have been reasonable by publishing false facts through the press conference. The Defendants were punished for the crimes of this case, such as the degree of support for the I market preliminary candidates conducted by the I market preliminary candidates conducted by the A, and it appears that there was considerable damage to the candidate's ability and credibility in the election, and that there was considerable harm to the candidate's ability to harm the candidate's reputation and credibility, and that there was a considerable damage to the candidate's ability to commit the crime of this case.

However, the defendants did not dispute the crime more in the past and did not repent of the mistake.