The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor on the grounds of appeal (misunderstanding of facts), the court below found the defendant not guilty, even though the defendant did not merely provide the client with convenience for the matters belonging to the duties of officers and employees of a financial institution and received money and valuables in return for such convenience, but did not receive money and valuables from the J and the executives and employees of a financial institution, on the pretext of promoting good offices or convenience

2. In a thorough examination of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below in light of the records, the court below's decision that the defendant was not guilty on the ground that the evidence of this case alone, based on the judgment of the court below, is not sufficient to support the defendant's efforts or convenience to prepare documents, etc. necessary for lending to financial institutions, and it is difficult to deem that the defendant received money, valuables, or other benefits under the pretext of mediating lending procedures and approval solicitation to the employees of financial institutions, is justified, and there was no submission of new evidence corresponding to the facts charged in this case at the court below, and therefore, there was an error

It does not seem that it does not appear.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.