1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in combination with Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 1, as stated in Eul evidence No. 2, as stated in Eul evidence No. 2, and as a whole, in the images of Gap evidence No. 4.

The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with the Plaintiff with respect to D New EM 52.0 automobiles owned by the insured C (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is a person who gets a proxy driver to board the Fcar owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant”).

나. 대리운전기사가 2013. 2. 3. 22:10경 피고 차량을 운전하여 화성시 향남읍 상신리 부근 서해안고속도로를 북쪽으로 편도 3차선 중 2차로를 따라 진행하던 중, 눈길에 미끄러져 1차로를 지나 중앙분리대를 전면부로 추돌하여 1차로를 가로막고 비상등을 켠 채 서 있었는데, 피고 차량 바로 뒤에서 1차로로 주행하던 G 차량(이하 ‘1차로 차량’이라 한다)이 이를 미처 피하지 못하고 피고 차량을 들이받자(이하 ‘선행사고’라고 한다), 그 충격으로 피고 차량이 튕겨 다시 미끄러지면서 3차로를 주행하던 원고 차량 진행 차로 앞으로 진입하면서 피고 차량 뒤쪽 좌측면으로 원고 차량 앞쪽 좌측면을 충격하는 사고가 발생하였다

hereinafter referred to as "the traffic accident of this case"

C. Under the foregoing insurance contract, the Plaintiff paid C KRW 8,640,000,00 in total, as the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, KRW 2,000,000 on February 15, 2013, and KRW 6,640,000 on February 21, 2013.

2. Determination:

A. (1) According to the above facts, the traffic accident of this case does not seem to be properly leading at night, and the traffic accident of this case is committed by the driver of the defendant vehicle who caused the preceding accident while driving the road without being bound in advance when the surface was sleepd due to snow, while stopping the surface, while causing the preceding accident.