logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.11.04 2019가합4327
사해행위취소
Text

1.(a)

Defendant B and Nonparty Incorporated Co., Ltd. on each real estate listed in the separate sheet between Defendant B and Nonparty Incorporated Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant B and Defendant C

A. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged in full view of the following facts: Gap's statements in Gap's evidence 1 to 9; Gap's response to each order to submit financial transaction information to the Small and Medium Venture Business Promotion Foundation and HI associations (Haa branch) and the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the response to each order to submit tax information to the Korea Electric Power Corporation and the Kim

1) On May 29, 2018, the Plaintiff is Nonparty E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”).

between E and Defendant D (hereinafter “Defendant D”)

(3) In the event of a loan of KRW 300 million, the credit guarantee period is set up by May 28, 2019, with a credit guarantee agreement setting forth the guaranteed amount as KRW 255 million (hereinafter “instant credit guarantee agreement”).

(2) On February 26, 2019, E concluded a registration of creation of a mortgage (No. 4221) with respect to each of the real estates listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estates”) with respect to Defendant B on February 25, 2019, the establishment of a mortgage (No. 4221 of the Jeonju District Court Kim Jong-gu Office), which caused the establishment of a mortgage agreement on February 25, 2019.

(3) Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) on March 28, 2019

(2) As to each immovable property listed in the separate list Nos. 1 through 10, the registration of establishment of a mortgage (No. 8046) was completed on the ground of the establishment of a mortgage (the maximum debt amount of KRW 1,88,000,000) (hereinafter the above contract) and the registration of establishment thereof was “registration of the 2-mortgage” and “registration of the 2-mortgage” of the registration of the 1 and 2-mortgage. In addition, the registration of the 1 and 2-mortgage, including the instant agreement, “the instant mortgage agreement” and the instant registration of the 1 and 2-mortgage, respectively.

4) E is the instant case.

arrow