(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.21 2014나55733

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.21 2014나55733

청구이의

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for this Court’s acceptance of the judgment of the first instance are as follows, except for adding the following judgments as to the matters claimed by the Plaintiffs, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiffs are inherited property of KRW 72,150,350,000 paid by the Korea Telecommunications Research Institute.

In light of the above legal principles, the court below's determination on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the ground that the court below's determination on the ground that the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the ground of appeal.

I would like to say.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' above assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.30 2018나75049

-대법원 2002. 1. 17. 자 2001스16 결정

-대법원 2002. 1. 17.자 2001스16 결정

-대법원 2002. 11. 8.자 2002스70 결정

-대법원 2002. 11. 8. 자 2002스70 결정