logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.09.16 2014고단799
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a C Poter cargo vehicle.

Around 20:20 on May 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) driven the said car and parked on the E-art side of the E-art located in 1,000 in 200; (b) but went behind from the right side of the bus platform of the New Twit Village, the Defendant had a duty of care to check the safety of the course by properly examining the right and the right and the right before moving.

Nevertheless, the Defendant failed to discover a G Sti-type car driven by the victim F (30 years of age) who was parked in order to turn to the left at the rear side of the Defendant’s cargo due to negligence, while neglecting this, and received the left side part of the said car as the left side part of the said car without discovering the G Sti-type car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of treatment for about three weeks by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the said car to the extent of KRW 296,528, such as the exchange and maintenance of the panion, and escaped without immediately stopping it, and without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents (1) (2);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of failing to take measures after the accident);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is committed without any measure to conceal drinking even when the defendant brought a traffic accident.

arrow