logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.08.27 2015고단2562
야간건조물침입절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 5, 2015, at around 03:36, the Defendant: (a) intruded the victim D’s office located in Gui-si C through the open door; (b) cut off the Defendant with five keys owned by the victim in the front line; and (c) one stude with one stude, with one stude.

2. On June 10, 2015, the Defendant came to the place indicated in paragraph (1) around 02:15, the Defendant: (a) opened an office door with a key that was stolen, as prescribed in paragraph (1), and intruded into the office door; and (b) obstructed cash that could be stolen, but did not discover but failed to discover.

3. On June 12, 2015, the Defendant came to the place indicated in paragraph (1) around 03:53 on June 12, 2015, and went to an attempted attempt due to the Defendant’s failure to discover the cash that would be stolen, such as intrusion into the office by the method described in paragraph (2) and following ruptures.

4. On June 13, 2015, at around 03:04, the Defendant came into a place indicated in paragraph (1) and went into an attempted attempt due to the Defendant’s failure to discover the cash that would be stolen, such as intrusion into the office by the method described in paragraph (2) and following ruptures.

5. On June 16, 2015, the Defendant came to the place indicated in paragraph (1) around 02:57, and went to an attempted attempt due to the Defendant’s failure to discover the cash that would be stolen, such as intrusion into the office by the method described in paragraph (2) and following ruptures.

6. On June 17, 2015, at around 02:18, the Defendant came to intrude into the office in the manner described in paragraph (1) in the same manner as that of paragraph (2), and subsequently stolen one earphones equivalent to KRW 5,00 in the market value of the victim’s possession on the book.

7. On June 28, 2015, the Defendant came to the place indicated in paragraph (1) around 03:17, and went to an attempted attempt due to the Defendant’s failure to discover the cash that would be stolen, such as intrusion into the office by the method described in paragraph (2) and following ruptures.

8. The Defendant reaches the place indicated in paragraph 1 around July 1, 2015.

arrow