The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the penalty (two million won of fine) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. In the judgment of the defendant, the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and appeared to reflect his attitude, and the fact that the defendant is not sufficiently capable of economic situations as a recipient of basic living benefits is favorable to the defendant.

However, in light of the circumstances, method, etc. of each of the crimes of this case, the crime is not good, the defendant did not agree with the victims, and the defendant has been punished several times for the same kind of crime. However, even prior to the occurrence of the same crime against the victims, considering the unfavorable circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, method of crime, circumstance, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, method of crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.