logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.06 2017고단6618
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[criminal history] On January 21, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and a summary order of KRW 5 million for the same crime in the Daegu District Court resident support on July 4, 2016, respectively.

[2] On October 12, 2017, the Defendant driven a CMW 528i car owned by the Defendant under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.130% from the 1km section to the road 500m high speed along the same face from the vicinity of the CMW 528i car in the direction of the 1km to the road in the direction of the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic eth.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Suppression photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (Attachment to a copy of the previous summary order);

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 of the Act on the Suspension of Execution) (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant’s personality and material damage has not occurred due to the instant crime; (b) the Defendant appears to have disposed

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 (1) of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Orders;

arrow