The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is between Defendant A and Victim B.

On May 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 14:33, 201, the studio 201 located in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group C, “I am away from the victim on the ground that I am "I am to am to am to am to another place; (b) if I do not do so, I am to am to am to am to am to.

In addition, the company made the words such as "Woman Lat," "Woman Latn", and assaulted the victim's head bond beyond knife, the left face side part of the drinking, and the blue part of the blue blue with blue.

2. The above facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the victim B submitted a written agreement on June 22, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case, stating that “I will not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the defendant.” Thus, the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.