The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the judgment of the court below is too heavy (the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for six months, the taking of sexual assault treatment programs for forty hours, and the sunset number No. 1).

2. The judgment of the court below is based on favorable sentencing grounds, including the fact that the defendant is living against the defendant while making a confession of the crime, the fact that there is no previous conviction, the agreement with some victims, the fact that he has made efforts to treat impulse disorders after committing the crime, etc. However, considering the fact that the crime has been committed not less than 40 times a year and the fact that the crime has been committed not less than 40 times a year and the most victims have not agreed with each other, the reason for unfavorable sentencing, such as the defendant's age, family relationship, economic situation, the background and motive leading to the crime, and all other matters concerning the sentencing as indicated in the records and the theory of change in the records of this case, the punishment of the court below is judged to be appropriate, and there

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.