logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.05 2015고단2097
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B The three facts charged in the third floor of the Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City are "seven rooms", but according to the statements, etc. made by the defendant B in this court, it is recognized that the six rooms are "six rooms" (17 pages, 26 pages of investigation records). Since there is no impediment to the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, the change is recognized ex officio. (including one air room), it is a business owner who operates a business of mutual similarity with "D" with facilities such as (including one air room), toilets, and a commercial sex acts employed by the defendant together with E.

At around 21:00 on October 24, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 20,00 from B within the room No. 101, and performed a similar act with F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant and the ordinary defendant B;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E, F, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (in the event of a field control, documentary evidence photographs and a publicity to the Internet site business establishment-folization);

1. Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant, who is a female employee, should not commit a second offense against his/her mistake, and in addition, the defendant's age, occupation, character and conduct, mode, scale and period of business, and circumstances before and after the crime is determined in consideration of all the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, occupation, character and conduct, mode of business, size and period, etc.

arrow