A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant left Korea on October 27, 1997 and stayed illegally in the United States, and changed his name to D on May 2014, and entered the Republic of Korea on June 16, 2015.

1. Fraud;

A. On July 8, 1997, the criminal defendant against the victim E made a false statement to the victim in the G office of the victim E’s operation in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, that “a 40 million truck will be provided as security and repaid without molding until August 8, 1997.”

However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to timely repay money from the injured party, even if he borrowed money from the injured party because he did not receive the “H” wage from the manufacturing company, such as advertisements and traffic signs operated at the time, and issued the so-called household allowance to prevent the so-called return of the money.

Accordingly, the Defendant received 380,000 won from the injured party under the name of the borrowed money after deducting the interest from the interest.

B. Around 14:00 on October 21, 1997, the criminal defendant against the victim I stated that "the defendant would provide the victim with the "H" as security and pay the amount equivalent to nine million won out of the lease deposit amount of 10,000,000,000 won of the lease deposit amount of 101, 2312, 2312, Jung-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, where the victim I works for the victim I in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan GovernmentJ, and the victim I operates the "H" of the manufacturing company, such as home advertising and traffic signs, etc., which is an employee, due to the need for 9 million won."

However, the Defendant, who was operating at the time, did not pay the “H” wages and did not have sufficient economic conditions to prevent so-called “H” from returning, and accordingly, was thought to have closed down the “H” as well as to have received a refund of the lease deposit from the lessor and immediately escape abroad, and thus, the Defendant would be willing to provide the lease deposit as security or repay the borrowed money at once.