Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On February 28, 2017, the Defendant 23:00 Spocheon-si C Apartment 306:101, the Defendant thought that he was fing himself on the upper floor due to noise between ordinary stories, while can cans and beer beer and he was fing on his hand on his hand for a dangerous object on the kitchen beer, which is a dangerous object on the kitchen beer, on the ground that he was finging, and the Defendant fing off the upper floor of the 202 string door (18cm in total length, 29cm in length, 18cm in length). However, the Defendant fing off the 202 string door that he was living on the upper floor of the victim D (nick, 47 years old). However, the victim was unaware of the wind, but the victim was not aware of the attempted wind.

Thus, the defendant carried dangerous objects and attempted to threaten the victim, but did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each statement;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the current literature and criminal escape photographs;

1. Articles 286, 284, and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which was used by the Defendant at the time of the instant crime, was a very dangerous tool, and multiple residents of apartment units could witness or recognize the site due to the disturbance and fear situation at the time.

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the fact that the defendant suffered from depression at the time was committed without clear opportunity, that the defendant was not in a special relationship with the victim of peace, that there was no criminal punishment once, that the defendant was remarkably divided, that there was no other criminal punishment, that the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, attitude after the crime, etc.