1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of this court is as follows: "interest and delay damages" in Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "damage for delay"; "cleaning work, etc." in Part 13 shall be deemed as "to install facilities that guide cleaning work, lighting facilities or construction sites"; and " there is a dust" in Article 16-17 shall be deemed as "it is difficult to view that the construction of safety facilities, such as starting facilities or lighting facilities, such as lighting facilities, are necessary"; and the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding "additional decision" in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act with regard to the assertion that the plaintiff adds the defendant Gangwon-do to this court.

2. The Plaintiff asserts that Defendant Gangwon-do did not meet the standards prescribed by the Act on Promotion of the Transportation Convenience of Mobility Disadvantaged Persons (in and out of place 1.5 meters at intervals) and caused the instant accident. However, it is difficult to see that the instant accident was installed in the place of the instant accident pursuant to the said Act. Moreover, the instant accident occurred when walking on the road outside the visible road, not the passage of the victims, and it is difficult to see that there exists a causal relationship between the violation of the installation distance of the instant visible and the occurrence of the instant accident. Thus, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals against the Defendants by the Plaintiff are dismissed as it is without merit.