The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of all the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is against whom the main reason for appeal (e.g., the two years and six months of imprisonment) is against the defendant and the defendant is the primary offender, the punishment imposed by the court below (e.g., imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant shows the situation where the defendant applied for the crime of this case and reflects it, that the defendant's vehicle CH car (hereinafter "Defendant's vehicle") operated by the defendant is covered by the automobile comprehensive insurance, and that the defendant is the first criminal without any previous conviction.

However, the crime of this case occurred when the defendant is under the influence of alcohol 0.116% while driving a vehicle at a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed while driving the vehicle at the crosswalk where the signal, etc. is installed, and caused an accident involving the victim D (16 years old) who was crossinging the crosswalk pursuant to the red signal as it is, by negligence, and by negligence, caused an accident involving the victim's front offender part of the vehicle, and immediately stops the vehicle and does not take necessary measures, such as aiding the victim, thereby causing the victim's death in the workplace. Thus, the crime of this case resulted in the victim's death in the low blood shock shock at the same site without permission, and without checking the situation, etc. of the victim who is a high school student under the age of 16 who was under the age of 0.16, and without checking the situation, etc. of the victim who was under the influence of alcohol, which is highly likely to injure, and the defendant needs to punish the victim's life and body as well as the physical suffering of the victim.