A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 16:00 on June 6, 2016, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol at a D cafeteria located in Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, Sung-gun, in a manner that makes it possible for the Defendant to report the victim E (influence, 54 years old) who was fluencing the alcohol and to force indecent act by force, and then, the Defendant her son her son her son her son her son, and her son her son her son her son.

Accordingly, the defendant committed indecent acts by force against the victim.

2. On June 6, 2016, from around 16:00 to 16:20 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business, on the ground that the Defendant received the victim’s species for returning home from the victim from the said D cafeteria operated by the Victim F (hereinafter the age of 49) on the same day, the Defendant: (a) sounded the victim, “I am she would be she would be she would she face; (b) once I am she can she she she she she so that customers who were eating food can get out of the restaurant, and (c) could not enter the restaurant with the customers waiting outside the restaurant.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's business by force.

3. The Defendant received a request for verification of his identity from a slope G (38 years old) belonging to the Sungdong Police Station, which was called upon upon the date and time as stated in Paragraph 2, and at the place of the performance of official performance of official duties, and stated that “If he finds that he will produce why he will do so, he will prepare his position as a police officer only if he will live equally on the finite, and if he will immediately live equally on the world, he will take the position of the police officer only.” On the face of his head, the Defendant sawd the chest part of the police officer once again, and belbow part of the chest part of the police officer once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F, G, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the 112 reported case handling sheet and the H District Work Hours;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act, the applicable provision on criminal facts, the choice of punishment, the choice of imprisonment, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.