1. The defendant marks 1, 2, 3, 8, 7, and 1 of the attached Form No. 1 among the lands listed in paragraph 1 of the attached Table to the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 13, 1969, the deceased on February 13, 1969, the deceased on the attached list Nos. 1 and 2. The deceased on the deceased on February 13, 1969, and the deceased on the deceased (the deceased on May 7, 1952), the deceased on the part of the land in the attached list Nos. 1 and 1 and 1 as his children, and the deceased on February 13, 1969. The deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of the deceased on the land in the attached list Nos. 1 and 2 as his child, and the deceased on February 13, 1969. The deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of the real estate in the attached list No. 1 and 1 as his child.

After that, the heirs of the deceased held a family conference around February 1969 and agreed that the deceased would move to the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the deceased and the deceased would cultivate inherited real estate

3) After the death of M on February 1, 1972, the heir of the deceasedJ reached an agreement with the defendant who had been living in her natives to observe the religious life, gather his will, and cultivate inherited real estate. Accordingly, from around October 1972, the defendant resided in the building in question, and removed the building and constructed a new building on the same location around October 1978. 4) The defendant resided in the new building and cultivated the following real estate including the land listed in the attached list 1 and 2, but did not purchase the following real estate from the network J, etc., and subsequently completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the defendant using a false letter of guarantee or written confirmation, etc., and thereafter, the plaintiff, Gap, and Eul, who became aware of this fact, won a final judgment against the defendant, which became final and conclusive by filing a lawsuit against the Seoul Central District Court for cancellation of ownership transfer registration, etc. under the name of the defendant.

The defendant is about the area of 1,636 square meters in the name of the deceased J Ple Chang-gun.