1. The defendant,

A. 13,767,700 won to Plaintiff F, 22,496,050 won to Plaintiff S, and 885,900 won to Plaintiff AC and each of the said money.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: AE district housing site development project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Defendant

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on October 24, 2013 (hereinafter “adjudication of expropriation”): Each land indicated in the column for “land number” in the attached Table attached to Annex AH located in Bocheon-si (hereinafter “instant land subject to expropriation”) and each of the obstacles on the ground thereof (hereinafter “instant obstacles” and “land subject to expropriation in this case” collectively referred to as “land subject to expropriation in this case”) - The starting date of expropriation: The amount of compensation for losses on December 17, 2013 - The amount of compensation for losses indicated in the column for “amount of adjudication of expropriation” in the attached Table attached hereto.

- Appraisal Corporation: New Appraisal Corporation and Korea Appraisal Corporation;

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection on May 22, 2014 (hereinafter “adjudication”) - Compensation amount: The amount of compensation for losses as indicated in the attached Table’s “Adjudication on Objection” is as follows.

- An appraisal corporation: a dialogue appraisal corporation and a Japan appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “adjudication appraiser,” including an appraisal appraiser for expropriation ruling, and the result of appraisal on it is referred to as “the result of appraisal”)

D. The result of the market price appraisal commission against the appraiser AI (hereinafter referred to as the "court appraiser", and the result of the appraisal commission for the appraiser is referred to as the "court appraisal result"): - Contents of appraisal: The fact that there is no dispute as stated in the "court appraisal amount" column in the attached Table 1, 1, 2, and 1, 2 (including each number), each entry of Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1 and 2 (including each number), the result of the market price appraisal commission to the appraiser AI, the whole purport of the arguments,

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Of the land to be expropriated by the plaintiffs in this case, the time when they individually refer to the land owned by the plaintiff F, the land owned by the plaintiff, the land AK, and the land less than the AL land owned by the plaintiff AC in Boh-si.