logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.13 2018나69747
공제금 등 청구의 소
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Plaintiff A entered into a lease agreement and a mutual aid agreement. Plaintiff A’s brokerage, a licensed real estate agent, on February 20, 2012, H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”).

B) The road name address of the instant building, non-party I in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, the Suwon-si, and the 8th floor size of the building (hereinafter “instant building”). The road name address of the instant building is “YO in Yeongdeungpo-gu.”

(2) From February 28, 2012 to February 28, 2014, the lease contract was concluded with respect to K during the lease period of KRW 46,00,000, and the lease contract was concluded between February 28, 2012. On February 28, 2012, Plaintiff A entered into a lease contract with H during the lease period of KRW 43,000,000 and February 28, 2014, and entered into a move-in report for resident registration with the address as “O, K, and entered into on March 2, 2012, and completed the move-in report for resident registration on February 21, 2012, Plaintiff B entered into the lease contract with H as a broker of G, a licensed real estate agent, for each of the instant building during the lease period of KRW 200,000,000, and the lease contract was concluded between the Plaintiff and each of the said 30,314,2012.

Plaintiff

B paid KRW 41,00,000 of the remaining security deposit to H on March 31, 2012 after obtaining the fixed date on March 12, 2012, and moved into the said L, and made a move-in report on the resident registration on March 30, 2012 by stating the address as “O and L, in the Young-gu AO and L, in the Young-gu, the address was entered,” but the move-in report was made on April 10, 2014, but the resident registration was re-transfered as L of the instant building on April 15, 2014.

3. The defendant has property rights with the parties to a transaction, on purpose or by negligence, when the broker of this case engages in real estate brokerage provided for in the Licensed Real Estate Agents Act between November 16, 201 and November 15, 201 and G during the mutual aid period between G and G during the mutual aid period from April 23, 2011 to April 22, 2012.

arrow