logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.04.08 2015고정892
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on April 18:50, the victim F (39 years old) and the part of the victim’s breast part of the victim’s breast part of the passenger car operated by E in front of the passenger car operated by E on the front of the Da in the PPju City, at around 18:50.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Part F of the statement in the police interrogation protocol against the defendant [the defendant did not keep the victim]

Although the defendant asserts, the police statements of the victim are consistent, specific, and the victim immediately after the instant case, immediately after reporting to the police, made a statement about the damage, and thereafter, made a cross-examination of the victim and the defendant.

Witness

E in this Court, at the time of the case, did not regard the form of the defendant's price for the victim.

While stating that there is a physical contact between the two, the question is again asked whether there is a physical contact between them and that there is no memory.

against this, there is a fact that the defendant was against the victim's attack at the time of the police investigation and carried the arms and shoulder.

In light of the fact that E was the victim and the vehicle operation, and the defendant was the defendant's friendship, it was found that the defendant was not threatened with the victim solely by the above statement of E.

It is difficult to see it.

Rather, according to the statements of E, the defendant and the victim were saved with each other, and the atmosphere was saved by the defendant and the victim, and they were saved in the middle, so these statements are circumstantial evidence supporting the police statements of the victim that the defendant was saved at the time.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

arrow