All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The court below's scope of trial in this Court decided that two years of imprisonment with prison labor and eight months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspension of execution with respect to the defendant who was prosecuted as the charge of the charge of the child education substitute doctor, etc., and that the defendant and the prosecutor appealed only as to the part of the judgment below against the defendant among the judgment below, on the ground that the sentencing was unfair.

Therefore, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the co-defendant B for which no appeal has been filed among the judgment of the court below shall be separated and finalized, and the scope of the judgment of this court shall be limited to the part against

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

3. 판단 원심과 비교하여 양형의 조건에 변화가 없고, 원심의 양형이 재량의 합리적인 범위를 벗어나지 아니하는 경우에는 이를 존중함이 타당하다( 대법원 2015. 7. 23. 선고 2015도 3260 전원 합의체 판결 참조). 피고인은 자녀들을 양육하고 보호하여야 할 의무와 책임이 있는 어머니임에도, 어린 자녀들이 울며 보챈다는 이유로 자녀들을 폭행하거나 상처를 제대로 치료하지 않은 채 방임하였다.

또 한 피고인은 그와 같은 아동 학대 혐의로 수사를 받았음에도, 불과 수개월이 경과하지 않은 시점에서 생후 1개월이 채 되지 않은 피해자가 울며 보챈다는 이유로 머리 등을 주먹으로 때려 사망에 이르게 하였다.

Furthermore, the possibility of criticism is also high in that the defendant seems to have used the paper violence to his children while working for childcare or domestic affairs only on his own house.

However, it seems that the defendant's mistake seems to be repented in the truth from the investigation agency to the trial of the party, and it is difficult to say that there is a intellectual obstacle.