logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.09.04 2014고합143
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who has been in charge of the support of candidate tax, application for voting witness, and other administrative support for the candidate as D of the members council of Gwangjin-gu Do party, Jeonyang-si party, Jeonyang-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which was implemented on June 4, 2014.

In connection with the sixth-time nationwide local election, there are eight polling stations located in 48 places and voting witnesses for each polling station, but each Eup/Myeon/Dong election commission shall designate a witness by lot after receiving an application from those who desire to become a witness.

On June 3, 2014, the Defendant urged the employees of the election commission, such as the victim G (age 40), who called “(age 40), to be selected as a witness for the application of a political party,” at the Mayang-si election district (alley-dong and Mamadong) where the C Party E was going to a F candidate, and there were two voting witnesses at the Mayang-dong Elementary School and Middle-dong, and the Mandong Elementary School and Secondary School, and called to the office of the Mayang-si election commission, and called to the Mayang-si election commission (age 40).”

However, when the victim et al. refused to “Procedurally impossible,” the Defendant appealed against it, and the Defendant sent the victim a witness to the victim, stating that “I will send him/her to the witness. If he/she is wrong, I will be relieved of the inside.”

Around 06:00 on June 4, 2014, the Defendant sent two (3) witnesses to the Jinyang Elementary School, and the Magyang Elementary School, but the election commission failed to observe the election commission; (4) at around 06:35 on the same day, the Defendant sent the victim a cell phone call to the office of the election commission office in Mayangyang-si, H apartment 210 Do 403; and (3) threatening the victim to “I want to send the witness to the polling station. If I do not want to go to the election commission and the election commission.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim who is an employee of the election commission.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant.

arrow