1. The instant lawsuit was concluded on November 14, 201 by the final and conclusive date of December 1, 2017, when the decision to recommend reconciliation was made on November 14, 2017.

2...

The process of the instant lawsuit

A. On June 10, 2010, the Plaintiff Company issued 40,00 new shares (hereinafter “instant new shares”); among them, Defendant C accepted 14,167 shares and Defendant B’s 14,166 shares; the Plaintiff asserted that the amount equivalent to the purchase price of new shares was leased to the Defendants, and filed the instant lawsuit seeking the payment of the loan against the Defendants.

As to this, the Defendants did not borrow the amount equivalent to the purchase price of new shares from the Plaintiff, and the issuance of the new shares was also null and void.

B. On October 19, 2017, at the end of the amendment of the purport of the instant claim and the cause of the claim several times, the Plaintiff filed a statement of the amendment of the purport of the claim and the cause of the claim as of October 19, 2017, and subsequently revised the Plaintiff’s claim to seek delivery of the instant shares allocated to the Defendants according to the issuance of the instant new shares.

C. On November 14, 2017, this Court rendered a ruling of recommending reconciliation (hereinafter “the instant ruling of recommending reconciliation”) with the following contents, and the decision of recommending reconciliation became final and conclusive on December 1, 2017, on the grounds that the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not raise any objection.

1. The Plaintiff’s retirement of shares increased as of June 10, 2010 and shares issued under D around June 2007, to proceed with the following procedures for capital reduction.

The Plaintiff’s shares 18,001 shares of shareholders E; 27,00 shares of shareholders F; 27,00 shares of shareholders; 14,167 shares of Defendant C; and 14,167 shares of shares of Defendant C; and 22,499 shares of Defendant B; and 56,667 shares of shares of Defendant B; and 14,166 shares of shares of 22,49 shares. The Plaintiff shall retire and implement the capital reduction procedure.

2. The Defendants actively cooperate with the Plaintiff in the above capital reduction procedure.

3. The plaintiff waives the remaining claims.

4. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff.

However, on October 1, 2018, the Defendants decided to recommend reconciliation of this case.