1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On Aug. 1, 2015, the Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s work and the instant injury and disease Plaintiff entered the company B (hereinafter “B”) and worked in the company B in Ulsan, Inc. (hereinafter “B”), under the work order, “abbreed PA-by-products are separated in the empty drum,” and the Plaintiff performed incidental work using PA-by-products from November 1, 2015 to March 30 of the same month.

Then, around April 2016, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the D Hospital as “the instant injury and disease” (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”).

B. On July 22, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted the Plaintiff’s resignation and the Plaintiff’s report on the loss of insured status with employment insurance (i.e., the Plaintiff’s resignation) to the effect that “a resignation is made due to personal circumstances” in B (hereinafter “instant resignation”).

(2) On August 3, 2016, B prepared and submitted a report on the loss of insured status for employment insurance to the Defendant on August 1, 2016, and the Defendant accepted the report.

3) On July 3, 2017, B reported the loss of insured status for employment insurance based on the second Plaintiff’s retirement, and the Defendant accepted the report and notified the Plaintiff of the loss of insured status for employment insurance on August 4, 2017, and November 1, 2018. (c) On July 25, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for first medical care benefits with the Defendant by asserting that the instant injury and disease occurred as a result of the Plaintiff’s work. However, on September 7, 2016, the Defendant issued a disposition to grant medical care exemption to the Plaintiff on the ground that “the proximate causal relation between the instant injury and the Plaintiff’s work is difficult to be recognized.”

2. On September 13, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking the revocation of the medical care non-approval disposition as the Ulsan District Court 2016Guhap975, and the said court may have a proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s work on April 13, 2017 and the development of the injury or disease in the instant case.