logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.04.14 2016고정96
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving a Bchip car;

On December 12, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.115% among blood transfusions on December 17:40, 2013, and driven the above vehicle in front of the underground vehicular road of the head of the Dong-gu, U.S. at the ancient city along the three-lanes between the port of port and the port of port along the two-lane from the port of port to the port of port of port.

At the time, there was a vehicle parked on the back side of the vehicle that the Defendant was driving due to traffic congestion, so in such a case, there was a duty of care that the person engaged in driving service should thoroughly operate the front and the steering system accurately and safely.

Nevertheless, when the Defendant was negligent and neglected to do so under the influence of alcohol and was negligent due to an unforeseen cause, the Defendant C (Woo, 39 years old) was driving a victim C (Woo) who stops subsequent to the Defendant’s vehicle.

D The front part of the vehicle with soflur was driven by the Defendant as the back part of the said vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence, and at the same time damaged the above damaged vehicle to make an estimate of repair, such as exchange of softs, etc., KRW 478,848.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driving the said B-low vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.115% alcohol concentration from the section of approximately 1k to the place where the accident as referred to in paragraph (1) is located in the Dong-gu Dong-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A survey report on the actual condition of traffic accidents, a report on the detection of the main driver, a written diagnosis, and a written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph damaged vehicles;

1. Handling of traffic accidents under relevant Articles of the Act and selective punishment concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow