logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.04.05 2018고단24
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, on June 15, 2014, has to pay the money to the victims of sexual intercourses at the mutual infinite-dong, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, by October 16, 2014.

“.....”

However, the fact that the defendant promoted at the time does not smoothly implement the land development project in South-gu, Nam-gu, the defendant succeeded to the existing loan debt of KRW 1.826 billion in the process of transferring the land to the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., which he operated by the defendant, and the personal debt of KRW 500 million was also equivalent to the amount of KRW 50 million, and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan even if he borrowed money from the injured party due to

The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received a copy of the check from the victim, around June 15, 2014, around KRW 100 million; and (c) received one copy of the check from the victim.

2. Around October 18, 2013, the victim C, the representative director of the F (State), bears KRW 127,687,00,00 equivalent to half of the sales price of KRW 255,374,00, when selling in lots at KRW 512,314,00 the sales price of KRW 301, 501, 301, 301, and 709, 301, and 709, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si.

However, the defendant did not sell the above officetel normally, and the victim was confined in the detention house on September 3, 2014 to other cases, and asked the injured party to receive the G to receive money on his/her behalf, and he/she received redemption from G to use it on his/her own.

On March 2015, the Defendant received 300,000 U.S. dollars from the above G to the repayment of the officetel 709, and embezzled the amount of 150,000 U.S. dollars for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Part concerning C’s statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Copy of the protocol concerning examination of the police officer in G;

1. The statement of the police against C.

arrow