The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) does not constitute a violation of traffic signal as stated in the facts charged of this case.

2. In full view of the following circumstances that can be recognized by the court below by comprehensively taking into account the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, ① C (hereinafter “C”) of enforcement officers and the court of the court below specifically and consistently stated in the investigation agency and the situation of the Defendant’s signal violations; ② C appears to have been in a position to sufficiently confirm the Defendant’s signal violations at the time of enforcement; ③ C appears to have been in a position to have been in a position to sufficiently confirm the Defendant’s signal violations; ④ C appears to have no reason to make a false statement; ④ the Defendant requested C to the effect that he would cause the suspension of the disposition of an administrative fine to be imposed upon C at the time of enforcement; and ④ If the Defendant did not violate the signal signals, it is difficult to find reasonable grounds for the Defendant to request C to comply with the above request, the fact that

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.