1. The sentence against the accused shall be three million won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 5, 2016, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) was driving B cargo at the business office located in the Republic of Korea, located in 2509-51, as at the time of permanent stay at around 21:36, and was under control due to an excessive violation; (b) the Defendant would have been aware of the fact of distribution.

In the driver's address column of the person, the signature of D was written in the name column of "Seoul-gun C", "D", "E", "E", "B" in the vehicle registration number column, "B" in the vehicle registration number column, and "G and D" in the person column, and then arbitrarily written in the name side of D's name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of the name of D, a private document on fact certification.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) above, submitted to the above Korea-style public official who belongs to the office of the branch office of the Corporation and held the said investigation document as if it were duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written petition of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal investigation;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime: The occupation of exercising the above-mentioned documents under Article 231 of the Criminal Act: Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds of sentencing of the instant crime shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all the circumstances such as the background, method, result, Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, and principle of prohibition of disadvantage.